U/Schematic_Sound pitched in: check their comment (not copy pasting cause it's longer). Every tool it has can generally be done better in a purpose-built plugin or piece of hardware. u/devinkerr says: I’m a mastering engineer. Happy to sticky the response by an actual mastering engineer when they come.ĮDIT: So, it would seem I can't sticky responses by other people, so I'll just add them here:
I don't know a single professional mastering engineer who would use Ozone as their primary tool.
So what OP is really asking: I'm curious if any career mastering engineers actually primarily stick with Ozone? There are more accurate EQs, compressors, LIMITERS! wideners, better reverbs, exciters than what Ozone has. Sure, why not?īut does a mastering engineer receives a project, stretches their fingers and pops Ozone open to get to work? Not to my knowledge. But in my over 15 years doing this, it's far from what I've seen.Ĭould mastering engineers use Ozone? Absolutely, especially using the individual modules because they like the processing of that particular unit and they think it may fit well with whatever project they are working on. I mean, some might, who am I to know intimately what everyone uses. So do professional mastering engineers who do this at a high enough level to have a mastering room with full range monitoring use Ozone as their main tool for doing their work? Of course not. Professional engineers think "Ozone = Processing", just like anything else. The bedroom production world thinks "Ozone = Mastering". Ozone is pure marketing, despite it being actually a pretty good plugin. Okay, I feel the need to sticky this since no actual mastering engineers has showed up yet, and the top responses are "I'm not a mastering engineer but.".
0 kommentar(er)
